Noteworthy Mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico — Reading Companion
Edition facts
The source record for Noteworthy Mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico — Reading Companion measures this digital text at 7,794 words, 34 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 13.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Mammals -- Mexico -- Sinaloa (State),” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergThis 1962 publication from the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History reports on twenty mammal species collected in Sinaloa, Mexico, during field trips from 1950 to 1961. The authors—J. Knox Jones, Jr., Ticul Alvarez, and M. Raymond Lee—focus on specimens that extend known geographic ranges, clarify taxonomic questions, or complement existing data. The work is structured as a series of species accounts, each presenting external and cranial measurements, collection localities, and brief ecological notes. Notably, the text includes precise measurements in millimeters and weights in grams, reflecting a commitment to quantitative detail. The map referenced in the text is not included in this digital edition, but the locality descriptions are sufficiently detailed to trace the reported range extensions.
Range Extensions and New State Records
Several species documented in this report represent significant southward range extensions. For example, Peromyscus merriami goldmani was previously known only from the type locality in Alamos, Sonora; eight specimens collected near El Dorado and El Fuerte extend its known range approximately 200 miles south-southeast. Similarly, Neotoma albigula melanura is recorded for the first time in Sinaloa, with four specimens from northern parts of the state. The authors note that these records fill gaps between previously known populations in Sonora and Chihuahua. Onychomys torridus yakiensis had only one prior Sinaloa record; thirteen new specimens better define its distribution, including a 115-mile south-southeast extension from the town of Sinaloa. These findings underscore the value of targeted field collecting in under-surveyed regions.
Taxonomic Clarifications and Comparative Morphology
The authors address taxonomic ambiguities through careful comparison of specimens. For instance, a female shrew from El Fuerte was initially suspected to be Notiosorex evotis but, after comparison with topotypes, was identified as N. crawfordi. The text notes that a previous report of evotis from El Carrizo likely also refers to crawfordi. In the account of Bassariscus astutus, the authors highlight a dental anomaly: the third upper premolar (P3) is consistently present in B. a. saxicola but absent in B. a. flavus; one Sinaloan specimen had P3 on the right side only. Such morphological details are central to the subspecies determinations made throughout the report.
Reproductive Data and Habitat Notes
The species accounts include reproductive information where available. For Peromyscus merriami goldmani, two females collected on November 18 and 19 were pregnant: one with four embryos (8 mm crown-rump length) and the other with three (11 mm). A female Onychomys torridus yakiensis taken on November 17 carried two embryos (23 mm), and another from the same locality on November 18 carried four embryos (10 mm). These data provide insights into breeding seasons. Habitat descriptions are brief but specific: Neotoma albigula melanura was trapped in runways under cholla cactus on a slope above a rocky arroyo, while Peromyscus merriami specimens were taken in lowland areas, consistent with known habitat preferences.
Readers interested in the mammalian fauna of northwestern Mexico will find this report a concise source of primary data. The authors explicitly state that the work is preliminary, as field studies aimed at a comprehensive treatment of Sinaloa's mammals were ongoing. The detailed measurements and locality records make this a useful reference for future taxonomic and biogeographic studies. When consulting this text, note that the map referenced in the species accounts is not reproduced in this digital edition; locality coordinates may be inferred from the place names and distances given.
Reading the careful specimen lists from Sinaloa, I felt that quiet thrill of noticing what others overlook—a shrew’s range, a woodrat’s taxonomy. It reminded me of mornings watching sparrows at the feeder, common yet mysterious. That same gentle attention to the unremarkable lives in Fifty Birds of Town and City — Context and Discussion, where the familiar becomes worth a second, slower look.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.